What happens to the memory of the child as they participate in the world?

What happens to the memory of the child as they participate in the world?

As parents, do we realize that our absorbent children take in all the measure of us, as our beliefs, opinions and ideas? Do we realize that we were born without language, or culture or race or religion? Do we realize that this is all a measure based on a past, as traditions, that we bring from one generation to the next? Do we realize that we move as what we were exposed to in our early environments to such a degree that we become our parents as we grow older?

If we learn by imitating, by taking in, the world around us, we can see that every single movement we move as, becomes the child, because the child mirrors everything the parent does on a cellular level. That is how great our capacity to take in form exists as. So, do we as parents, carefully watch our every move?

An example; Let us look at a moment when one might be exiting a car. The day previous to this was busy, and the traffic slow. One stops to get some gas, pulls into the bumping bay, and opens the door to step out to the pump. As one shuts the car door, with the child/baby sitting in the back seat, there is a rush in the way you as a parent moves within shutting the door. All of your frustration and anxiety is loaded into that movement of shutting that door. One may notice that one shut the door with more energy and drive than one expected, as one was thinking about how one was late, and the day was not moving in expected ways. All of this is memorized as a movement by the child. All of it.

Later, perhaps two weeks or so, the child is playing with something on the table, and suddenly moves in a rushed way, filled with what was imitated, as what was memorized and what was taken as modeled as sensed by the child in their world. The child accidentally, knocks something off the table, because the energy as the model of the parents become the modeled behavior of the child. The parent then yells at the child. The child is confused, because the child was being what the child had learned, had imitated, and the child does not yet understand how this all works, nor does the parent.  Thus the child is blamed for their action that was a model of the parent. The child taking in and moving the same way. Is the child going to develop confidence in such an event? Is the child learning to respect and participate in their world in effective ways? No.

Thus, the child becomes value judgements as the measure within. They become the stress of the parent. They become that inner stress, to the extent that they miss the practice of being present here, being aware of the world around them. They begin to lose their attention to the practical world. And then we parents, reprimand them for this. Can we really blame them, when we were the model of the separation? Can this same process be handed down generation after generation? Yes.

If we begin to understand this, we can begin to understand the accumulation of attention deficit dis-orders that grow, perhaps exponentially, in our children. It is, very simply, that the measure as the experience of the child, is not equal to the measure of the world around them. On the side, many of us realize, by the time we sort all of this out, when we are older, that this did not need to exist from the beginning. We can blame our parents. Is this a solution? No

What would be a solution?

To ground ourselves back into practicing being an intervention that directs our focus back into the practical. We can use the structure as words, to be the real measure of ourselves here in this life we must live as what we are. We can rebuild our inner measure, through bringing that energy that is not equal to being at ease in our worlds, back into a measure, using words, to become ‘ small’ enough to see the details of living, and thus enabling ourselves to move with self confidence and ease in our lives, realizing that we can focus here, and learn the real measure of living, to then not fear learning anything, meaning learning about what we really enjoy doing.

If you could have the power, and the means to build a child, to see directly here, thereby having a superior memory, and building self trust, self confidence and self esteem, what would that be worth to you? You would not have to depend on a school, you could make sure that your child was sound, was structured in a way they could learn, choose and succeed at whatever they wanted. They would have the freedom to choose, because instead of being anxious, insecure, uncertain, they would have an ordered memory, the measure of their experience, that enables them clear self direction.

Only a parent can ensure that the child reaches their full potential. Everything a parent does, is absorbed by the child. And this takes time to clear up when it is not grounded and at ease. Since prevention is the best cure, why not use technology, that never gets tired, never has a stressful day, help you help yourself, through ensuring that, via words as the perfect tools of measure, are without all those emotions one does not realize are in every single movement and is being learned by the child, by association- imitation- mirroring, to make sure these words are clear, clean, stable. 

The means are here, and they are very cost effective. It is what each would have wanted for themselves. 

How do we Learn and what is the Absorbent Mind?

How do we learn and what is the absorbent mind, our natural learning ability?

How do we learn? How did I learn to play the violin? How did the children I taught learn to play the violin? How did I teach the children in the schools?

We repeated what was being taught, which is within the direct instruction model. We introduce the material, we explain the concept- the form, the structure, the design, the object and its way of moving. We repeat this. We show examples. We hand this over to the children to ‘ move as’ by themselves. We, sometimes in our current habits, send home more examples to practice, to repeat. This is the practice in step, of repetition.

Our research makes it clear that children who have the opportunity and exposure to hearing/seeing/experiencing more variation in words/vocabulary, specified subject matter- such as parents who have studied science, or music, or golf - tend to have a greater capacity to do that to which they were exposed. And since the behavior, as the know how, of the parents and their focus is repeated again and again, that absorbent mind of the child will pick this up and imitate it. So, we learn by repetition. That is the base. And we know that children have very absorbent minds. We understand how rabidly they can learn languages. We understand that a child who grows up in a home where there is a lot of music being performed and practiced and talked about will often begin a musical instrument and within 10,000 hours have mastered that instrument. So, by the age of seven, with consideration to allow the child to become what is around it, and practice the structure, which is bringing awareness into the form, which is integrating this into a structural memory within to build neurons that pair back and expedite the movement of the informed awareness structure, to become that protege- as the word we use to describe someone who learns something at a young age. 

Our feral children are the same, they become the measure as the focus of the sense practiced in becoming the space and timed measure as the behavior of the host. So great is our ability to learn, to sense the world around us and order this when given the structure to experience and model again and again, in its application and form. Thus we learn by repetition, and within this we discover our physical bodies and learn with mis-takes as a natural part of this learning process. A child falls down many times before they walk with ease.

This also begs the question as to what we are doing with this sense that can become the very form and practice repeated again and again? Is our natural learning ability something like water?

Is our ability to absorb extendable to forms around us, just as that feral child imitates and repeats with trial and error, with and as this absorbent substance that is a sensory mechanism practicing the shape and form and movement range of the world around it?

Thus, if we place our children in a box, a classroom, for 12 years, expecting them to learn through abstracting about knowledge and information ONLY, what are we creating with this absorbent natural learning/sounding/modeling.practicing/reflecting ability? Since we become what we practice, do we end up aggrandizing what is a singular good into a limitation? Are we making this good-turned-limitation as this practice, larger than that used as a movement to model/absorb into thinking as abstracting as imagining ONLY? Would this not create a disconnect from reality? Would this not be the imprint passed down from one generation ( as this is what is generated) to the next? Thus, would that child not have to sort out living here in physical reality in practice and the generational information? Would this cause some chaos if that generational imprint were lacking in a sound structural memory of the practice of living as physical states of being that is what our lives are while we are here on earth?

Can knowledge and information be manipulated within such a systemic design? Remove that absorbent ability from the practice of living, and inform it through spaced repetition- as going to school and sitting in a room, shut off from the physical natural world, and practice through spaced repetition the form of imagination use ONLY, until this becomes the means of seeking direction and the information of self structurally. Where does this end up? Would this not be attention away from practical living? Would that memory, or could that memory, fill up, like a computer?

How many have noticed that it becomes more difficult to be flexible as we age? How many have noticed that as we get older, things we could do before seem to become more and more difficult? This is the same as saying that moving in our worlds becomes more difficult. We tend to want, narrower comfort zones to remain in as a consequence. Why would this be? Could this be that our memories, as our experiential maps, as our repeated structural cognitions are limited and done from imagination ONLY, as we were taught to move, by systemic design, to repeat- is this like computer memory, a stagnation, that eventually fills up?

This begs the question. If our focus was on the practice of the form as what we are, as sensory physical mechanisms,  could we cross reference the physical reality, and realize memory as our imagination for what this is, and ‘ wipe’ the slate as memory clean with each use so that it never gets filled up? Would this not mean understanding memory for what it is, and practice becoming the forms around us, and using memory, cognition for what is really is? 

How can we transform our present practices into what would allow the full potential of this mechanistic ability? No one wants to lose their job, no one wants to limit this in a child either. We cannot continue to move as we are as our educational structure, because the consequences of this practice of placing that absorbent unique expression of our children into thinking and abstracting and memorizing ONLY, in a box, are manifesting as all manner and degree of so-called attention deficits. This will only compound more, and we will become what we make movies about; zombies. What is a zombie really? It is someone who is not present in practical reality, it is someone ‘dead’ to common sense. And does that memory, consume the flesh of the physical body that was the means to absorb the world and express as a physical state of being? Do our so-called fairy tales reveal to us what we are doing as in what we are accepting and allowing?  Can we not see the forest through the trees because we are all products of this separation and mis-use of our absorbent ability? When we have interventions for those already genetically and environmentally cluttered, and existentially placed into a method of practice that continues the lack of structure through a slow motion of  in-form-ation,  do we not see that we are in effect slowing down what was a natural inclination to realize the practice of movement in a physical formation that is what we are?

On another practical front, when we teach compassion, and the benefit of the golden rule we teach in our schools, to give to another as one would give to one’s self, is this not an admission that we have this capacity to with our natural ability to take on form, be able to sense the form of another even in their actions as dimensions of what it means to be focused here? And does this not show how we become the measure of our parents and that this substance is the mechanism to be and do this in practice here? If we use this to practice living in grounded practical ways, what would happen to our overall living with one another? Would we become this golden rule and realize that this is the means to reaching our full potential?

To reground and refocus we are going to need help. We can use what we have externalized to help focus us, reform us, back into a practical measure of living as what we are. We can use technology to refocus us, to rebuild our cognition- our directive information within. We can use the great plasticity of our physical bodies to reform ourselves structurally to walk the process of remeasuring our absorbent fluid self back down to the ground, so that those interventions are no longer necessary by the time the child, the man, reaches a certain age, because the child will begin to realize how this works and be able to self direct and consider all things, taking that which is good and does no harm, because they see directly, because they are living the smallest measure of order, they live the words they know as the placeholders of the information of reality. It is there right in front of us, we are the words we know. The more words a person has had the opportunity and experience to encounter, in variation, the greater the potential success of the child. Words create a structural navigation system, when stable and sound that fluid absorbent mind/self has the means to focus and practice living here. The words are living words. This would be a life of joy as this would be a child who could express their full capacity, that joy of communion with actual real living. You decide. The tools are here.

                We are the measure of our experience and words are placeholders for the measure of our  

                                          experience. We then build a sound mind/cognition.

Word Recognition without the Clutter of Association.

An education gives a human being the structure to communicate and organize the world around them. Much of this is done using words. We go to school and learn to organize ourselves via words, which is why vocabulary is such a strong indicator of success.

This tells us, that education, as inner structure, is programming the human, to perform. The natural learning ability of the human, is this ability as common sense. When this common sense is split into fragments, as values before practical common sense, time is spent supporting the value over practical common sense; common sense being how we direct and create with the world around us. Common sense is that task, that practice that exhibits creating something tangible.

If our vocabulary is limited, and taught in the order of value, instead of practice, then we learn value making, as ideas, instead of actual step by step practical application. This value making, is what our media is and does, to create a need, as a value, that becomes what is demanded, as what is essentially programmed, thereby sidestepping common sense. As this, our children have little skill development, and a huge focus on a few values. Just think how much time is spent talking about clothing, and or decoration, instead of the details of the means of how the object being the decor is created. Wanting to decorate, is not a bad, but when this one perspective is the goal of many, which practically does not work in the world, because only a few can actually do this, which takes money, and social networking, and we tend to want the famous name, so usually just a few become this and then have the means to survive within it - which is basically a monopolistic formation, we can see the spin of our limitation, and the gap in our understanding. If someone comes to point this out, the program of the person, does not want to slow down and look at the details, and their abstract mind is busy rushing ahead as their formation made larger than life.

Imagine a child in a school, who has not the detail, the focus, never having the opportunity to build such, and living in an environment, those first seven years, where the exposure was of the consumerist media teaching limited values, ignoring detail, and thus imprinting a limited vocabulary, and all of it with values? Then place such a programmed abstract as mind, into a school setting. Can we see how that child will need to be carefully balanced out and that many reactions will come up as what is missing and as what must be counter balanced to get that child moving in common sense? Can we begin to see that blame and punishment has no solution because it only names the wrong but does not direct? And, how can a public school really have the time to walk the gaps in development with each child and even read the gaps with clarity, when the teachers themselves are the same products of such a system that has intensified in the last 100 years, as the last three or four generations? Conceptually, one has to be able to not only collect data, so to speak, but also read that and see the patterns instantly and then be able to, in a moment, direct into solution.

But, if most degreed people, can only process about 250 words per minute, then how can the adults of this world do this? Really, they cannot. Which is why so many of the problems and behaviors are not being directed into solution, because the adults are not processing with any real measure of depth perception. Which, the children are unable to do as well. So it is like, or should I say, it IS, the blind leading the blind. We have to be willing to admit this, and just as I suggest with the children, no longer blame, no longer reprimand, but, simply, realize it and redirect in ways that begin to build an inherent ability to process the patterns of common sense, within and without, to reconstruct, what is here, taking that which is good, and does no harm, and aligning our children and ourselves into what we want, which is to communicate with one another, be creative, from the making of the painting to hang on the wall, to the conversation we have as we sit in what we created, in ways that expand our awareness of what it means to live a full life, a life where all our senses are alive, and our experience is one filled with manifesting all potential. 

The way and the means of doing this is with our words.  Words are the naming of the measure of this world. Which is why those with a large vocabulary, tend to have a capacity to self direct, because they see more directly, because they have attended to, via words, the measure of practical physical reality. We have to be able to see the structure of the physical world and see the structure of the words we use to communicate, and convey information. 

If you have ever corrected a series of state tests, it immediately becomes apparent that children are very capable of being taught. Mostly, each has a different gap that needs to be practiced and walked through. And if one has tutored, it can be realized that a child can learn structure, and use such to begin to process knowledge and information, and the physical world, and then begin to move in more self directive ways, which over all, is being critical thinkers.

Thus, the words our children know, determine their abstract development. If this abstract development has become concrete, meaning habituated - which is saying “ stuck” in limitation - this abstract must be rebuilt. This is not something new, it is realized within the constructivist paradigm developed in the mid 1900’s after a couple of generations of a society experiencing the industrial model of production. Which means, we as adults could see what was happening.

As I have said, if I learned to process musical notes very fast by the time I was seventeen, to the point where I could read blocks of patterns as the notes, enough to generate a song, then why had I not been taught this with words?

First, I had not learned the notes by association, I had learned the note signifies a precise measure as a certain sound produced a certain way directly on the instrument. No pictures, no values, other than intensity of sound etc.. I had used focus mechanisms to narrow my focus, to realize that single unit of measure so that no clutter came up within interacting with that note. Thus, when I played, I could process without a memory of pictures, the note was the note, period.

So, if we look at media, and the adults we have become, obsessed with DATA only, we can see that we are not seeing directly, and we can understand that we are not seeing directly because we are not solving the problems of lack in our children. Remember, if we are blaming, reprimanding without clear direction, and much patience because of the accumulation of this, in essence we are lacking in depth perception. Our depth perception is our natural common sense, it is simply “ polluted” with value touting over practical action. And we are so immersed in this, we really do not know the difference, it has been going on for generations. And yes, I have to remind myself of this, because i am as much a product of this as anyone, so I slow down, and cross reference all the time, even when I am being rejected, pushed away, called names, etc. because such is not an act of giving a direction that is stable and sound, leading to, for example, giving the children the means to be self directive.

So, Techno- Tutor, is the means to clean up the abstract mind, filling in the gaps of understanding and thus self directive capacity that is of a direct seeing measure of practical reality. it is getting the words in without associations being a support as a belief that context builds meaning with a text only. It is getting the words in as their unit of measure in practical reality, so that then the children have a stable starting point to become self directive, understand the practical world, and therefor, stabilize within seeing directly and working with the means of practical reality.

Techno-Tutor is cost effective and efficient. It empowers the child to build an abstract as the words, so that they can answer in class, knowing the words as well as they know their names, knowing their words enough to be able to actually create a “ song” that has form and structure, that can be seen as a whole, as the pieces are clear, and then can objectively be seen and carefully looked at, corrected as the child subjectively lives their words as directives symbiotically in practical daily living. Techno Tutor is a win- win for parents, for schools, for the children, for the society, the the nation, for the gift of life all around us. 

Allow us to prove this. Techno -Tutor has special offers for schools. It is a gift that keeps on giving.

                   the simplicity of this, it is not complicated, which is hard for a world blinded by complication.